4th January 2008
hello ,
for a while i have been asking doctors and searching the web for drugs that
are "arousal reducing" for men .. opposite to the viagra effect .
an arousal reduction drug which would prevent social hardness in men with little effect over its long term use ..
the reason for this drug need is: dramatic prostate cancer prevention !
although doctors may argue that active sexuality may help reduce prostatic problems .. i beleive that " over-usage " of any gland in the human body
will reduce it's life span ...
take for instance sugar ..too much of its consumption would more likely result in diabetes ... although you have some "wired " people that would always argue that it is not ..scientificaly proven ...
it is a statistically proven however, that people who over consume sugar over long term are more prone developing diabetes ..
because ,.. the pancreas is not a machine , right ? ..because the gland would get "tired " at some point from secreting insuline no ? don't you think ?
or are our material factory glands productions unlimited whatever our food consumptions ??
okay then !
so similar argument im trying to bring in the case of prostate cancer..
prostate would get tired or inflamed from heavy loads of work or stuffness from sperm that is constantly not ejaculated ...
social sexuality ..for those who see cute sceneries on a regular basis ..
those men who desire the curves/ lust , they see ...but not getting an ejaculation going .....because of social shame ......
these would more likely develop prostate cancer over long term ..i think
it is a social problem related to unsatisfied temptation which is destructive to the male reproduction apparatus ..
there is a need for a drug on the market that would reduce hardness in men which are in situations of close contacts with femals and who cannot be sexual partnairs but yet are temption partnairs
this might certainly save lives ...
there is no need of losing so many lives because it is a shame saying that some men do get hard socially when interacting with attractive females..
perhaps in the grave, only then, will we understand the funny part about our sexualitites ..
further point to mention..if doctors gave testesterone reducing hormones for those with prostate cancer..why not giving men prone to sexual arousal a drug that is opposite to viagra and non-hormonal ...
finally sexuality has killed billions of men by far and sent few other billions to hell , accomplishing nothing from their lives ,chasing desires , and living for good times ...
isnt it time to take social sexuality drugs more seriously ?
thank you
for a while i have been asking doctors and searching the web for drugs that
are "arousal reducing" for men .. opposite to the viagra effect .
an arousal reduction drug which would prevent social hardness in men with little effect over its long term use ..
the reason for this drug need is: dramatic prostate cancer prevention !
although doctors may argue that active sexuality may help reduce prostatic problems .. i beleive that " over-usage " of any gland in the human body
will reduce it's life span ...
take for instance sugar ..too much of its consumption would more likely result in diabetes ... although you have some "wired " people that would always argue that it is not ..scientificaly proven ...
it is a statistically proven however, that people who over consume sugar over long term are more prone developing diabetes ..
because ,.. the pancreas is not a machine , right ? ..because the gland would get "tired " at some point from secreting insuline no ? don't you think ?
or are our material factory glands productions unlimited whatever our food consumptions ??
okay then !
so similar argument im trying to bring in the case of prostate cancer..
prostate would get tired or inflamed from heavy loads of work or stuffness from sperm that is constantly not ejaculated ...
social sexuality ..for those who see cute sceneries on a regular basis ..
those men who desire the curves/ lust , they see ...but not getting an ejaculation going .....because of social shame ......
these would more likely develop prostate cancer over long term ..i think
it is a social problem related to unsatisfied temptation which is destructive to the male reproduction apparatus ..
there is a need for a drug on the market that would reduce hardness in men which are in situations of close contacts with femals and who cannot be sexual partnairs but yet are temption partnairs
this might certainly save lives ...
there is no need of losing so many lives because it is a shame saying that some men do get hard socially when interacting with attractive females..
perhaps in the grave, only then, will we understand the funny part about our sexualitites ..
further point to mention..if doctors gave testesterone reducing hormones for those with prostate cancer..why not giving men prone to sexual arousal a drug that is opposite to viagra and non-hormonal ...
finally sexuality has killed billions of men by far and sent few other billions to hell , accomplishing nothing from their lives ,chasing desires , and living for good times ...
isnt it time to take social sexuality drugs more seriously ?
thank you
